Skip to main content

Nike

198 guides25,714 productsShop all Nike

Review and sizing guides getting searched

Buyer's Guides

LeBron 20

Position: First true low-top LeBron; reviewer calls it the closest to a guard shoe the line has gotten. / Fit: Made in China = TTS, Made in Vietnam = size up half; two upper versions (knit-like and cloth-like) feel nearly identical.

92/100

Sabrina 2

Position: Low-cut guard shoe; reviewers compare cushion to Ja 1 / Luka 4, lockdown to Jordan Brand 3. / Fit: True to size for standard widths; same length as Sabrina 1, Book 1, LeBron 21 for one 50-hour reviewer.

88/100

Air Max 1

Popularity: The most timeless Air Max silhouette; fairly slept on at retail / Comfort: Honest old-school cushioning; firm, not plush

87/100

Vomero 18

Use case: Daily mileage, long runs, recovery; not a tempo or speed shoe. / Ride: Dual-density ZoomX/ReactX — firm but cushioned, stable, high drop.

86/100

Air Max 90

Popularity: One of the most collected Air Max silhouettes ever / Comfort: Good for a 35-year-old design; not modern-tech plush

86/100

Sabrina 1

Court use: Low-cut guard shoe; quick guards and active wings who want lockdown and a low ride. / Fit: True to size; standard-width last; wide feet are a straight pass given no wide release.

86/100

Air Max 95

Popularity: Deep cultural roots in UK and Japan; iconic Neon colorway / Comfort: Excellent dual Air cushioning after a mandatory break-in

84/100

Zoom Vomero 5

Popularity: Still one of Nike's safest retro-runner pickups / Comfort: Comfortable for long walking days, but more balanced than ultra-plush

84/100

Zoom Fly 6

Use case: Plated daily training, tempo runs, HM racing — versatile across paces. / Ride: Soft ZoomX midsole with Flyplate; rocker-led roll; more comfortable than Zoom Fly 5.

84/100

Ja 1

Position: Low-cut guard signature; long-form review owner stays in the low-cut lane on principle. / Fit: Narrow-foot friendly; the 6-month reviewer sizes half-up by preference, says TTS is fine due to limited padding.

83/100

ReactX Rejuven8

Popularity: Visible recovery-shoe hit with repeat colorway demand / Comfort: Soft and light; can run hot or sweaty

83/100

vomero

Popularity: High visibility across 2024-2026 sneaker rotation posts. / Comfort: Repeatedly praised for all-day casual wear comfort.

83/100

KD 17

Position: Forward / wing signature; bigs do well in it, shifty guards usually do not. / Fit: Tends to run slightly long; a US 13 buyer in Book 1 and Kobes finds US 13 in the KD 17 a little big.

82/100

G.T. Cut

Popularity: Strong basketball community visibility across Cut 1 through Cut 4 / Comfort: Responsive Zoom cushioning is the line's biggest strength

82/100

Mind 001

Popularity: Early 2026 hype piece with limited drops and fast sellouts / Comfort: Soft foam plus tactile nodes; unusual rather than universally plush

81/100

Air Tech Challenge

Popularity: Cult classic with devoted following, frequently on clearance. / Comfort: Repeatedly called the most comfortable retro in rotation.

81/100

Air Force 1

Popularity: The best-selling Nike sneaker silhouette globally / Comfort: Adequate Air cushioning, but heavy and stiff out of box

81/100

Kobe 9 Protro

Court use: Guard shoe; quick players who want Flyknit lockdown, light weight, and elite traction. / Fit: True to size in the Elite High Flyknit; the Elite Low collar rubs out of the box and can need break-in.

80/100

Air Force 1 Low

Heritage: 1982 Bruce Kilgore basketball design; first Nike shoe with Air-Sole cushioning, now a 40+ year lifestyle anchor. / Fit: Runs slightly long for many; SB Dunk and Jordan 4 wearers commonly drop a half size on AF1.

80/100

Kobe 6 Protro

Court use: Low-profile guard shoe; quick players who want court feel and lateral lockdown over plush cushion. / Fit: Generally true to size but narrow; many wide-foot owners size up half a size or skip entirely.

80/100

Kobe 8 Protro

Court use: Low-cut guard shoe; works for quick guards and wing players who want a roomier Kobe silhouette than 6. / Fit: True to size; more accommodating last than Kobe 6 Protro, with a softer mesh upper.

80/100

KD 18

Position: Forward-leaning ride; community consensus is forwards/bigs first, guards only if you commit to lockdown work. / Fit: True to size for normal feet; stiff in the first couple of games before molding.

80/100

Metcon 10

CrossFit/Hyrox role: Flagship CrossFit trainer; strong for lifting, weaker for longer runs. / Stability: Wide, firm heel stays planted for squats, deadlifts, presses, and carries.

80/100

Pegasus Trail 5

Use case: Road-to-trail commuting, dirt road runs, easy fire-road days; not technical trail. / Midsole: ReactX foam; same family as the road Pegasus, cushioned daily-trainer feel.

79/100

Lebron 21

Cushion: Cushlon foam carrier, Zoom Turbo forefoot, large heel Zoom, midfoot carbon shank; ~4.2mm low drop. / Fit: Two upper variants: 'pronounced cables' colorways (Cool Grey, Optimism, Easter) run stiffer than Algae / Tahitian / Freshwater.

79/100

P-6000

Popularity: Y2K retro runner hit; more accessible than the Vomero 5 / Comfort: Surprisingly good for basic foam; wide-footed buyers praise the fit

79/100

Air Tech Challenge 2

Popularity: Cult heritage retro with steady enthusiast pickup on reissues. / Comfort: Recent pairs comfortable; thick insoles, firmer than foam runners.

79/100

Dunk Low

Popularity: Shifted from hype piece to accessible everyday classic / Comfort: Firm EVA midsole with no Air unit; basic by modern standards

78/100

Cortez

Popularity: Timeless classic with West Coast and Forrest Gump cultural roots / Comfort: Lightweight nylon version praised; leather stiffer; basic cushioning

78/100

Air Trainer 1

Popularity: Cult favorite, limited mainstream hype in 2025-2026. / Comfort: Comfortable for many, but cushioning feels old-school firm.

78/100

Kobe 4 Protro

Popularity: Iconic low-top, worn by 100+ NBA players and collectors / Comfort: Elite lockdown, fast break-in, firm low-to-ground forefoot

77/100

Air 180

Popularity: Cult favorite with periodic retro and collab spikes. / Comfort: Balanced ride, firmer than many modern runners.

77/100

Air Max Penny 1

Heritage: 1995 Penny Hardaway signature; first sneaker with full-length Air for Magic-era Orlando. / Fit: Runs big — go down half a size from your normal Nike size.

77/100

Dunk High

Popularity: Slept on — cheaper than Lows on resale, massive colorway range / Comfort: Same EVA midsole as Dunk Low; SB version has Zoom Air and is far better

77/100

Air Max Plus

Popularity: Deep subcultural roots in Australia, France, and UK street culture / Comfort: Tuned Air provides genuine all-day casual comfort

77/100

Vomero Plus

Popularity: Growing in running circles, lighter traction in sneaker forums. / Comfort: Consistently praised for plush bounce on easy and long runs.

77/100

React Element 55

Heritage: 2019 value-tier Element with the same React foam midsole as the Element 87 at lower retail. / Fit: TTS for standard and moderately wide feet; works without going up half.

76/100

Kobe 8

Popularity: High visibility on drops, softer sustained sell-through. / Comfort: Low, responsive ride; impact protection is divisive.

76/100

KD18

Popularity: Strong hooper talk, limited core sneaker-fashion momentum. / Comfort: Plush impact protection, but some report heel or forefoot pain.

76/100

Air Humara

Popularity: Niche but growing, frequent WDYWT posts, Undefeated collab boosted visibility / Comfort: Divisive — adequate for daily wear, some find it surprisingly comfortable

76/100

Waffle Debut

Heritage: 2022 Nike retro runner: Cortez upper, Daybreak waffle sole, Decades-era proportions. / Fit: TTS in standard width; slimmer Cortez-era profile, not chunky like 2090.

76/100

Book 1

Popularity: Strong niche following, but not universal hype favorite. / Comfort: Comfort improves after break-in and stays wearable daily.

76/100

Ava Rover

Popularity: Growing cult following among comfort-focused sneaker enthusiasts / Comfort: ReactX midsole delivers soft, stable all-day walking comfort

76/100

Air Max Uptempo 95

Heritage: 1995 Scottie Pippen basketball signature; visible Air unit and bold side AIR branding. / Fit: Standard 90s Nike basketball width; runs slightly long, expect a roomy fit.

76/100

Vaporfly NEXT%

Popularity: Foundational modern marathon super shoe with lasting runner interest / Comfort: Very soft ZoomX at speed, less natural for slow walking or casual use

76/100

Kobe IX Low

Popularity: Cult demand remains high, but not every colorway sells out. / Comfort: Elite traction, but cushioning feel is frequently debated.

75/100

Pegasus Premium

Popularity: High-visibility Nike experiment with polarized runner feedback / Comfort: Soft-looking and premium, but heavy and not always lively

75/100

Air Foamposite One

Popularity: Strong nostalgia demand; mainstream hype is selective. / Comfort: Supportive once broken in, but stiff and warm.

75/100

C1TY

Popularity: Niche momentum, limited mainstream conversation versus Nike staples. / Comfort: Mostly comfortable daily wear, but support opinions stay mixed.

75/100

Pegasus Plus

Use case: Daily mileage with tempo capability; lighter, peppier than standard Pegasus. / Foam: Full ZoomX midsole — same race-foam family as Vaporfly/Alphafly.

75/100

Blazer Mid

Popularity: A vintage high-top staple that looks better beaten up / Comfort: One of the least comfortable mainstream Nike sneakers; Jumbo is better

75/100

Air Flight 89

Heritage: 1989 Nike Basketball; worn by Scottie Pippen and Shawn Kemp during Bulls and Sonics championship years. / Fit: TTS; runs round in the toe and slightly long, especially in leather colorways.

75/100

Air Presto

Popularity: Y2K cult favorite; modest mainstream heat in 2025-26. / Comfort: Very light and breathable; sock-like, minimal cushioning.

75/100

Air Max 97

Popularity: Third-most-popular Air Max behind the 90 and 95; Silver Bullet is a grail / Comfort: Full-length Air feels stiff, not plush; ranked 4th in AM comfort

74/100

Air Max 2090

Heritage: 2020 Air Max Day reimagining of the 1990 AM90; the Air unit is 200% larger than the original. / Fit: Slightly long and not narrow; owners report TTS works coming from Air Max 1 8.5, even with wider feet.

74/100

Air Zoom Spiridon

Popularity: Respected retro runner, still sleeper versus mainstream staples. / Comfort: Soft bounce and low fatigue for daily wear.

74/100

Lunar Roam

Popularity: Steady niche traction, not a dominant mainstream silhouette. / Comfort: Light and cushioned, but long-day comfort is mixed.

73/100

Kobe IX Elite

Popularity: Cult demand remains high for major Protro colorways. / Comfort: Responsive court feel, but heat and collar friction recur.

73/100

Kobe III Protro

Popularity: Strong hoop buzz, lighter mainstream style momentum / Comfort: Responsive after break-in; day-one feel can be firm

73/100

First Sight

Popularity: Early niche fashion attention, no broad sneaker consensus / Comfort: Untested long-term; built as lifestyle sportswear, not a running shoe

73/100

aone

Popularity: Fast launch sell-through, then steady niche demand / Comfort: Plush, responsive Cushlon 3.0 ride praised for the price

73/100

Air Footscape Woven

Popularity: Cult following, limited mainstream heat. / Comfort: Generally comfy underfoot; collar rubbing appears.

73/100

KD19

Popularity: New summer 2026 signature; early reviews lean lukewarm, community mixed-to-cool / Comfort: Protective Cushlon-plus-Zoom ride, but heavy with hot, sweaty synthetic upper

72/100

Air Max Ishod

Popularity: Strong skate-community awareness, limited broader sneaker momentum. / Comfort: Mixed comfort: quick break-in, but some stiffness complaints.

72/100

Air Foamposite Pro

Popularity: Cult demand spikes around OG retro drops. / Comfort: Firm at first, improves after repeated wear.

72/100

v2k-run

Popularity: Strong mainstream visibility; less hyped among enthusiasts. / Comfort: Comfortable foam ride; no performance Zoom cushioning.

72/100

Air Alpha Force 88

Popularity: Niche enthusiast following; appreciated but not widely hyped. / Comfort: Adequate Air Sole cushioning but clunky for all-day walking.

72/100

ISPA Sense Flyknit

Popularity: Cult-favorite ISPA model, never mainstream / Comfort: Soft casual feel is better than the shape suggests

72/100

Pegasus Trail

Popularity: Well-regarded in running communities, minimal presence in sneaker culture. / Comfort: ReactX foam praised as exceptionally comfortable for all-day wear.

72/100

Vaporfly 3

Popularity: Major third-generation Vaporfly with strong marathon-racing recognition / Comfort: Soft, bouncy ZoomX with more forgiving upper volume than v2

71/100

ReactX Rejuven8

Popularity: Viral 2025 launch, polarizing design, now hitting discount outlets / Comfort: ReactX foam plush and cloud-like, better support than Crocs

71/100

ReactX Rejuven8 Slide

Use case: Recovery-slide tier: house, gym, post-run, short walks; foam-comfort over support. / Fit: Sizing inconsistent across colorways; volt pairs have run smaller than black in same size.

71/100

Killshot 2

Popularity: Recognizable classic, but less dominant than before. / Comfort: Firm ride; fine daily unless your feet run wide.

71/100

Air Terra Humara

Popularity: Steady niche chatter; collab waves, limited mainstream momentum. / Comfort: Comfort splits opinion: decent walking support, firmer long-day feel.

71/100

Roshe One

Heritage: 2012 Dylan Raasch design; minimalist mesh-and-Phylon lifestyle shoe inspired by a meditation cushion. / Fit: Narrow last; wide-foot owners report it squeezes the forefoot and splits skin at the heel.

71/100

Shox R4

Popularity: Growing retro buzz, still niche versus Air Max staples. / Comfort: Supportive bounce for some, but heavy and stiff for others.

70/100

ISPA Flow 2020

Popularity: Cult techwear pair, never a broad Nike hit / Comfort: Soft enough for casual walking, not max-cushion plush

70/100

Field General

Popularity: Growing niche buzz, still below mainstream icon status. / Comfort: Low-profile ride; comfort acceptable, cushioning feels minimal.

70/100

Pegasus

Popularity: Strong runner familiarity, modest fashion-community pull. / Comfort: Balanced ride, though forefoot can feel firm.

70/100

Air Baltoro

Popularity: Niche retro lifted by the 2024 Stussy collab and 2025 reissue / Comfort: Sole runs softer than the rugged hiker shape suggests

69/100

Air Kukini

Popularity: Cult niche following, minimal mainstream hype / Comfort: Lightweight and breathable with firm Air cushioning

69/100

Air Griffey Max 1

Popularity: Strong 90s nostalgia, but reissues often sit on shelves / Comfort: Cushioned enough for casual wear, but very heavy underfoot

69/100

Air Max 270

Popularity: Lifestyle Air Max; popular for casual wear and height gain / Comfort: Deeply polarizing — love or hate depending on foot shape

69/100

Air Max Dawn

Heritage: 2021 Nike GR mashup pulling design cues from multiple older Air Max generations onto an AM90-style sole. / Fit: TTS for most; runs like a standard Air Max in width.

69/100

Calm Slide

Generations: 1.0 firm, 2.0 soft-foam revamp; the version meaningfully changes the comfort verdict. / Use case: House, dorm, gym deck, short walks; 2.0 is comfortable enough for around-the-block.

69/100

Shox TL

Popularity: Frequent inline drops, but discussion depth stays niche. / Comfort: Springy underfoot, but long-wear comfort is divisive.

69/100

ISPA Link

Popularity: Niche ISPA model with concept-first appeal / Comfort: Easy casual comfort, but not especially cushioned

69/100

Blazer Mid 77

Heritage: 1972 Blazer hoops shape rebooted in 2017 with vintage cream midsole and stitched swoosh. / Fit: Narrow at the toe; multiple owners say size up half if you have a normal-width foot.

69/100

Air Diamond Turf

Popularity: Active niche demand from 90s Nike and Deion fans / Comfort: Stable and supportive; owners rate it around 7/10

69/100

Kobe I

Popularity: Cult basketball demand; core fashion chatter remains limited. / Comfort: Responsive Zoom and stability, but warmth shows in long runs.

69/100

Air Trainer SC High

Popularity: Respected Bo Jackson classic, still niche versus hyped retros. / Comfort: Balanced Air cushioning, but stiff upper needs break-in.

68/100

Waffle One

Popularity: Launch-era hype cooled into niche loyalist demand. / Comfort: Light daily comfort, mixed results on long walks.

68/100

Air Max Muse

Popularity: Niche women's-line release; spikes around standout colorways. / Comfort: Comfortable, though the platform sits noticeably high underfoot.

68/100

ISPA Universal

Popularity: One of the easier ISPA pairs to understand quickly / Comfort: Comfortable casual sandal with useful adjustability

68/100

Zoom Fly

Popularity: Busy in run circles, quiet in sneaker culture. / Comfort: Bouncy top layer, but firmness still polarizes.

68/100

Gato

Popularity: Visible 2025 relaunch, still niche in rotations. / Comfort: Low-profile Cushlon ride; fine daily, not plush.

68/100

Killshot 2

Popularity: Recognizable staple, now more sale-driven than hype-driven. / Comfort: Firm and uncushioned for many; break-in commonly reported.

68/100

Zoom Vomero Roam

Popularity: Discussed mainly as a winter sneaker pick, not standalone hype / Comfort: Firm Air Zoom cushioning, needs break-in, inherits Vomero 5 platform

68/100

ISPA Mindbody

Popularity: One of the easier modern ISPA models to actually wear / Comfort: Soft casual comfort is the main reason to buy

68/100

V5 RNR

Popularity: Regular pickups, but no broad mainstream craze / Comfort: Comfortable daily wear; less ideal past very long hours

67/100

LeBron 22

Court use: Big-cushion LeBron-line shoe for forwards and bigs who want impact protection. / Fit: True to size for normal-width feet; some owners size up half a size to escape forefoot squeeze.

67/100

Air Trainer Huarache

Popularity: Niche revival with loyal nostalgic support. / Comfort: Mostly comfortable with secure, supportive hold.

67/100

Air Max2 CB '94

Popularity: Niche collector following among 90s basketball fans, not a mainstream lifestyle pick. / Comfort: Roomy and comfortable once on, but stiff break-in and an awkward entry.

67/100

Phoenix Waffle

Popularity: Minimal organic discussion in core sneaker communities / Comfort: Comfortable out of box for most, but some report discomfort

67/100

ISPA Link Axis

Popularity: One of the more visible late ISPA footwear experiments / Comfort: Comfortable once on foot, with a stable casual ride

67/100

Terminator Low

Popularity: Niche interest, mostly periodic pickup posts. / Comfort: Firm ride with mixed long-wear comfort feedback.

67/100

Air Footscape

Popularity: Active niche interest from archive-Nike fans, not broad hype / Comfort: Roomy and easy underfoot, though the ride leans firm

67/100

Vaporfly 4

Popularity: Current-generation Vaporfly with strong race-day attention / Comfort: Lighter, lower, and more refined than v3; less maximal than Alphafly

67/100

Space Hippie 04

Popularity: Cult attention persists, mainstream heat cooled. / Comfort: Lightweight feel, but cushioning feedback is split.

66/100

Alphafly NEXT%

Popularity: Kipchoge-era flagship Nike marathon racer with major super-shoe status / Comfort: Huge ZoomX cushioning and Air pod pop when pushed; awkward at slow pace

66/100

Ja 3

Popularity: Hot in basketball circles, limited lifestyle crossover, Ja's off-court issues hurt brand / Comfort: Soft ZoomX cushioning praised, but narrow fit causes discomfort for wider feet

66/100

Sabrina 3

Popularity: Strong performance buzz, limited mainstream lifestyle traction. / Comfort: Low-profile and responsive, but cushion can feel harsh later.

66/100

Tanjun

Heritage: Launched 2015 as a value-tier mesh lifestyle shoe; the cheap-end Roshe successor in the Nike lineup. / Fit: Standard width with stretchy mesh; works for some wide feet when wider models fail.

66/100

Air DT Max '96 Low

Popularity: New 2026 low-cut submodel with early Deion and 90s nostalgia interest / Comfort: Air-cushioned ride; early owners call the Low easy casual wear

66/100

Diamond Turf

Popularity: Nostalgia-led demand with selective sellouts and restocks. / Comfort: Generally wearable; often described around 7/10 comfort.

66/100

Air More Uptempo

Popularity: Nostalgia-led demand, but limited mainstream chatter lately. / Comfort: Generally cushioned, though weight is a recurring complaint.

66/100

Air Huarache

Popularity: Niche loyal following; never a dominant mainstream wave / Comfort: Light, well-cushioned Nike Air ride once the shoe is on

66/100

Air Diamond Turf II

Popularity: Niche 1990s retro with steady but small enthusiast interest. / Comfort: Firm and heavy; wearable for short days, not plush.

66/100

Air Max 2013

Popularity: Niche visibility, spikes during Stussy-led moments. / Comfort: Cushioned ride praised for long casual wear.

66/100

Pacific

Popularity: Quiet niche following; nearly invisible in core sneaker communities. / Comfort: Basic firm cushioning, adequate for casual wear not extended walks.

66/100

Air More Uptempo Low

Popularity: Niche rotation pick; light core sneaker discussion / Comfort: Cushioned step-in but widely described as heavy

65/100

Giannis Freak 6

Popularity: Discussed mostly in hoop-performance and deal threads. / Comfort: Low-profile feel; cushioning opinions split by player preference.

65/100

air-max-goadome

Popularity: Niche ACG cult following; limited mainstream sneaker heat. / Comfort: Supportive after break-in; hard stock insole needs swapping.

65/100

Initiator

Popularity: Budget runner with niche following, minimal mainstream hype / Comfort: Decent cushioning for the price, rigid out of box

65/100

Air Rift

Popularity: Niche cult following; polarizing in the mainstream. / Comfort: Fine for light wear; leather version stiff at first.

65/100

Blazer Low

Popularity: Steady release cadence, but limited core-community buzz. / Comfort: Mostly firm underfoot; break-in commonly required.

65/100

Air Zoom Huarache 2K4

Popularity: Cult favorite among hoopers; 2026 retros sold out fast at $210. / Comfort: Zoom Air and Phylon ride; muted by modern cushioning standards.

65/100

Air Max SNDR

Popularity: Visible in pickups, but still niche versus Air Max staples. / Comfort: Comfortable once on-foot; zip bootie can feel restrictive initially.

65/100

Air Max TL 2.5

Popularity: Niche revived favorite, slept-on rather than mass-hyped. / Comfort: Plush insole and Max Air; called comfier than the 97.

65/100

Air Max DN8

Popularity: Visible chatter, but limited real-world adoption. / Comfort: Comfortable for daily wear, less plush than expected.

65/100

Air Force 3 Low

Popularity: Niche revival; demand tied to NIGO collab colorways. / Comfort: Full-length Air feels good once you solve the fit.

65/100

Giannis Freak 7

Popularity: Steady hoop discussion; criticized for dropping Zoom Air. / Comfort: Cushlon foam ride; bulky, heavy on foot.

65/100

Shox BB4

Popularity: Niche but beloved retro-hoops pick tied to Carter's Olympic dunk / Comfort: Owners call it comfortable, but heavy and firm rather than bouncy

65/100

Gamma Force

Popularity: Low enthusiast traction despite steady inline releases. / Comfort: Mixed: comfortable for many, stiff for others.

64/100

Air Monarch IV

Popularity: Widely recognized, mostly through its dad-shoe meme status / Comfort: Praised for standing, errands, and long shifts on foot

64/100

Air Zoom Flight 95

Popularity: Niche retro basketball collector piece, not mainstream lifestyle. / Comfort: Forefoot Zoom Air helps, but firm and heavy at 14.7 oz.

64/100

Air VaporMax

Popularity: Peaked in 2017-2018 with Off-White; now a niche/nostalgic choice / Comfort: Deeply polarizing — bouncy springiness, not plush cushioning

64/100

Waffle Racer

Popularity: Recently returned, but organic discussion remains limited. / Comfort: Firm retro ride; opinions range from fine to harsh.

64/100

KD 4

Popularity: Strong retro hype, mostly nostalgia-led demand / Comfort: Great traction, but cushioning is often called firm

64/100

Air Penny 2

Popularity: Steady nostalgic demand; niche next to top retro staples. / Comfort: Structured supportive ride; short break-in before it settles.

64/100

Air Max LTD 3

Popularity: Niche visibility, mostly small owner-discussion pockets. / Comfort: Mixed comfort reports; some call it heavy.

64/100

Nocta Glide

Popularity: Niche following, widely dismissed due to Drake association / Comfort: Forefoot Zoom Air and padded collar provide solid everyday comfort

64/100

Air Max Uptempo

Popularity: Niche nostalgia pickups; limited broad conversation volume. / Comfort: Supportive underfoot feel, but comfort opinions are split.

64/100

Rejuven8

Popularity: Early demand was high; later pairs hit discount chains. / Comfort: Underfoot cushioning is praised, but heat and arch firmness recur.

64/100

Terminator High

Popularity: Niche enthusiasm, limited mainstream momentum after 2024. / Comfort: Flat underfoot feel; all-day comfort is mixed.

64/100

Mac Attack

Popularity: Niche demand, with occasional retro-driven attention spikes. / Comfort: Firm but wearable; not a max-cushion option.

63/100

Air Max Flyknit Racer

Popularity: Niche following; limited broad sneaker momentum / Comfort: Light and breathable, with a soft casual Air Max ride

63/100

Air Max Moto 2K

Popularity: Low-key online presence; little core sneaker discussion. / Comfort: Owners rate it among their best walking shoes; firm, not plush.

63/100

KD 6

Popularity: Beloved KD retro; PBJ and Night Vision among most-requested reissues / Comfort: Plush heel Max Air plus forefoot Zoom, no break-in

63/100

Shox Ride 2

Fit: Narrow-leaning feel; standard feet can try true to size, while wide feet should size cautiously or skip. / Comfort: Firm, heavy, and divisive underfoot despite visible Shox and Air-style tech cues.

63/100

Attack

Popularity: Cult-following pair, but mainstream buzz cooled after relaunch. / Comfort: Firm, low-profile ride; comfort is acceptable for casual days.

63/100

Astrograbber

Popularity: Niche buzz, mostly collab-driven rather than mainstream. / Comfort: Wearable daily, but cushioning stays on the firm side.

63/100

Ja 2

Popularity: Active among hoop buyers, weak fashion-scene momentum. / Comfort: Low-to-ground and responsive; cushioning feels firm for some.

63/100

Air Max DN

Popularity: Visible chatter, but often discussed as a slower seller. / Comfort: Frequently praised for long shifts and daily walking comfort.

63/100

Air Peg 2K5

Popularity: Steady niche buzz, limited mainstream hype traction. / Comfort: Generally comfortable; firmer and heavier than modern trainers.

63/100

Air Superfly

Popularity: Strong media push, limited organic buyer discussion so far. / Comfort: Wearable for casual days, not plush; snug arch.

63/100

Air Max Phenomena

Popularity: Search interest around the sneaker-loafer trend; thin community discussion. / Comfort: Visible Air helps underfoot, but the upper stays narrow.

62/100

Air Flightposite

Popularity: Cult following among 30-plus collectors, limited appeal to younger enthusiasts. / Comfort: Surprisingly comfortable Zoom Air ride, but heavy at 16.5 ounces.

62/100

LD-1000

Popularity: Niche model, but visibility rose via 2024-2026 collaborations. / Comfort: Firm underfoot; break-in helps, heel stability stays mixed.

62/100

Air Max Waffle

Popularity: Under-the-radar but sells through quickly on Nike's app. / Comfort: Owners call it light and very comfortable, tongue aside.

62/100

Alphafly 3

Popularity: World-record marathon racer with strong running community following / Comfort: Plush ZoomX at pace, prominent arch and poor walkability off-pace

62/100

Clogposite

Popularity: Polarizing niche pair, but limited drops move quickly. / Comfort: Generally comfy after break-in, especially with thinner socks.

62/100

Air Max Pre-Day

Popularity: Liked but low-hype; never broke into core sneaker buzz. / Comfort: Split feedback: light and comfy for some, unstable for others.

62/100

G.T. Future

Popularity: High launch visibility, but buyer trust is still split / Comfort: Plush underfoot cushioning can be muted by the stiff shell

62/100

Free Metcon 7

Best use: Cross-training, HIIT, light-to-moderate strength work, and short runs under about 2-3 miles. / Fit check: Narrow-to-medium fit; wide E/EE feet should consider a half-size up or another trainer.

62/100

Crater Impact

Popularity: Sparse recent buzz, mostly older owner posts. / Comfort: Generally comfy for errands and long walking days.

61/100

Zoom Field Jaxx

Popularity: Bricked commercially, sitting at or below retail across colorways / Comfort: Consistently praised as comfortable with full-length Zoom Air

61/100

Offcourt Slide

Popularity: Frequent drops, but limited organic fashion chatter. / Comfort: Usually soft underfoot; firmness variance still reported.

61/100

Roshe Run

Popularity: Huge early-2010s hit; now mostly nostalgia mentions. / Comfort: Light and wearable daily, but outdated cushioning feel.

61/100

LeBron XXIII

Popularity: High awareness; sell-through uneven by colorway. / Comfort: Comfortable after a rough break-in; stiff collar early.

61/100

Victori One

Best use: Home, locker room, travel bag, pool-adjacent errands, and low-mile casual wear. / Fit check: Length can be generous while the strap stays tight over high-volume feet.

61/100

Calm Mule

Popularity: Owner reviews positive; sneaker-community style pull weak. / Comfort: Mostly liked by owners, with firm-foam complaints.

61/100

Air Max Portal

Popularity: Minimal sneaker community presence, mostly found at outlets / Comfort: Praised as softer than Air Max 1, chunky midsole cushions well

60/100

Aqua Turf

Popularity: Niche retro with limited core-sneaker buzz. / Comfort: Flexible and light, but cushioning is minimal.

60/100

Air Max Sunder

Popularity: Niche archive Air Max with limited community discussion / Comfort: Standard Air Max cushioning, snug neoprene sock-like upper

60/100

Air Max Goadome Low

Popularity: Niche cult interest; light mainstream sneaker conversation / Comfort: Firm out of box; needs break-in and an insole swap

60/100

Hot Step Air Terra

Heritage: Drake's first NOCTA x Nike sneaker, released 2022; intentional 2000s K-Swiss/Fila throwback shape. / Fit: Tight at the toes for many; owners report it cramps hard at TTS and recommend sizing up for wide feet.

60/100

Air Max LTD

Best use: Casual walking, errands, work-beater wear, and simple leather Air Max styling. / Fit check: True-to-size length, narrow toe box; wide feet should try on or size carefully.

59/100

Air Max 98

Popularity: Niche collector piece, overshadowed by AM1, AM90, AM95, AM97. / Comfort: Rates poorly for all-day wear; weak arch support, heavy build.

59/100

Air Max Moto

Popularity: Negligible; the Moto name lives mainly through the 2K reissue. / Comfort: Firm, supportive Max Air ride rather than plush cushioning.

59/100

Air DT Max '96

Popularity: Niche 90s nostalgia pick; outside mainstream sneaker rotation / Comfort: Max Air heel cushions; heavy build suits short wear, not all-day

59/100

Cygnal

Best use: Wet-weather city walking, winter errands, travel, and light trails. / Fit check: Often narrow in the toe cap; consider sizing up if your forefoot or big toe needs space.

59/100

Court Borough Low

Popularity: Low core hype; mostly budget-oriented mentions. / Comfort: Firm at first, acceptable after break-in for many.

59/100

Air Flightposite One

Popularity: Cult following; less mainstream pull than Foamposites / Comfort: Secure Zoom feel, but the ride stays firm

59/100

Daybreak

Popularity: Niche following; conversation spikes around occasional re-releases. / Comfort: Light on foot, but cushioning feels firm by 2026 standards.

58/100

Total 90

Popularity: Frequent drops and sellouts, but still niche adoption. / Comfort: Mixed comfort; several users report forefoot pressure.

58/100

Air Max Scorpion

Popularity: Recognizable but niche, with strongly split reception. / Comfort: Often cushioned and wearable, but sometimes heavy or firm.

57/100

Little Posite One

Popularity: Frequent drops, but limited organic conversation. / Comfort: Protective ride; firm feel and likely break-in.

56/100

LeBron 23

Popularity: High awareness; polarizing reception on looks and tech. / Comfort: Excellent once broken in; rough, blistering break-in first.

55/100

Free Metcon 6

Best use: HIIT, mixed gym sessions, machines, and short warmup runs rather than rope-heavy CrossFit. / Fit check: True-to-size length for many medium feet, but the bootie collar can rub the Achilles.

55/100

Court Vision Low

Popularity: Budget court shoe; widely available but dismissed by sneaker enthusiasts. / Comfort: Firm and flat with no Air or foam tech; toe crease pinching is common.

55/100

Air Zoom Drive

Popularity: Almost no organic community discussion; widely discounted. / Comfort: Dual Zoom Air and a lightweight build; little owner feedback.

49/100

Shox Z

Popularity: Low organic traction; visibility driven by boutique collabs. / Comfort: Firm, springy Shox feel; little Shox Z-specific feedback.

48/100

Astra Ultra

Popularity: Mostly release posts, with little sustained discussion. / Comfort: Long-wear comfort remains largely unverified by owners.

47/100

tiempo

Popularity: Strong in boot circles, quiet in sneaker rotations. / Comfort: Soft touch is praised, heel hold remains divisive.

46/100

Book 2

Popularity: Active hoop debate; weak mainstream style momentum. / Comfort: Bouncy Cushlon underfoot; molded uppers irritate ankles before break-in.

46/100

Air VaporMax Plus

Popularity: Niche and fading; owners say its moment ended around 2021 / Comfort: Deeply divisive; many report sharp midfoot or arch pain

44/100

Air Max Craze

Popularity: Limited traction beyond niche retro-Y2K circles. / Comfort: Mixed reports; generally wearable, but some heavier-feel complaints.

44/100

Nike Analytics

SoleFeed tracks 25,714 Nike products across 524 stores and 50K listings in real time.

Size Availability

Price Range

Price Trend

Region

Colors

17%
17%
10%
8%
7%
7%
5%
5%
4%

Releases

Live Prices, Search, and Filters

Search and filter active Nike listings by size, price, store, shipping, and availability.