Skip to main content
Buyer's Guide

PUMA Suede Review & Sizing Guide

Published Updated

An undeniable classic with Tommie Smith Olympic heritage, B-boy culture ties, and a wider fit than the Adidas Gazelle — exceptional value at $25-85 but the flat sole and water-vulnerable suede demand respect.

Key facts

Popularity
Underrated classic; PUMA's most respected silhouette
Comfort
Flat old-school ride; great for some, disappointing for cushion seekers
Fit
True to size; wider than Adidas Gazelle but still narrow for wide feet
Value
Exceptional — $70-85 retail, routinely $25-55 at discount retailers
Use case
Casual daily wear, B-boy culture, streetwear, beater shoes
Risk
Suede bleeds color when wet; flat sole provides zero arch support

Full breakdown

By the late 1970s the Suede had jumped from the basketball court to New York sidewalks, where breakdancers adopted it because the flat sole and grippy nap held up to spins and the wide toe box let them work. That b-boy association tied it permanently to early hip-hop culture. Puma later split the lineage: a wider strap version became the Clyde, named for Knicks guard Walt Frazier, while the Suede kept its plain laced face as the everyday icon.

FAQ

Is the PUMA Suede comfortable?

Polarizing. Users coming from cushioned runners find it flat and not very comfortable. But fans who appreciate the old-school flat-sole feel call them incredibly comfortable for daily wear. There is zero arch support — this is not a shoe for plantar fasciitis. The comfort is comparable to Vans, Converse, and other flat-soled classics.

PUMA Suede vs Adidas Gazelle — which should I buy?

The Suede is wider-fitting and cheaper, often found at outlets for $25-55 vs the Gazelle's $100. The Gazelle has more cushioning (EVA midsole) and is the current trend pick. The Suede's formstrip is more iconic in B-boy culture; the Gazelle has more fashion buzz. Both use suede uppers with the same water vulnerability. For wide feet, the Suede wins. For cushion priority, the Gazelle.